🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.